Greetings Friends,
Ryan and I have posted a new podcast on the subject of generosity. We also talk about where we have been in the past year. You can listen to it on the media player to the right under the title "Generosity."
Theology & Backgammon
Making theology fun
Friday, April 19, 2013
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
The Reign of the Dead One: An Easter Sermon by Ryan Garnes
The Reign of the Dead One:
An Easter Sermon by Ryan Garnes
The
cross – the central theological mystery of the Christian faith. The Apostle Paul proclaims:
Christ crucified, a stumbling-block to Jews and folly
to the Greeks, 24but to those who are the called, both Jews and
Greeks—Christ—the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25For
God’s foolishness is wiser than human wisdom, and God’s weakness is stronger
than human strength (1 Cor. 1:23-25).
The
receptor of the apocalyptic revelation joins with the angels, singing in full
voice:
‘Worthy is the Lamb that was slaughtered
to receive power and wealth and wisdom and might
and honour and glory and blessing!’ (Rev. 5:12).
to receive power and wealth and wisdom and might
and honour and glory and blessing!’ (Rev. 5:12).
During this Lenten season, you most
likely have heard the loud voices – which, in our culture, I refer to the
market as the loudest voice. You most
likely have been comforted once or twice by a great sale on chocolate bunnies,
frivolous faux grass, in season Reece’s eggs, or by the impending promise of pollination,
new life, warm weather, and spring break!
As we see with every major holiday, we cannot escape the materialistic
masochism mounted at the foundation of our cultural existence; and this, we
most all know, is merely fluff.
But
beyond the festive bunnies, delightful chocolates, and frivols, I hope that you
have had time to reflect. Some of you
may have been fasting for the last 40 days; and you are probably pretty excited
today to finally enjoy a piece of chocolate, a burger, or a caffeinated
beverage again – or whatever you gave up.
But I hope that this Lenten season has reminded you of your brokenness
and the joy of knowing the divine Healer.
My hope is that many of you,
during this Easter season, have heard the soft voice – the one that is least
acceptable and makes the least amount of sense to the masses; the one that sometimes
speaks in subtly subversive and strange parables that empower the lowly; the
one that, on occasion, says nothing at all, and in so doing, says everything
needed to dismantle the self-proclaimed rulers of this world; it is the voice
of our crucified Lord, who, before the crowds and the powers-that-be, submitted
in a peculiar way to the cross of insurrectionists; it is the voice of the dead
One made to rule.
EASTER:
A STORY OF PENTRATING NUMBNESS WITH GRIEF AND DESPAIR WITH HOPE
It is my intention to suggest today
that the Easter story is one that addresses numbness with grief and despair
with bewilderment. It is one in which the death of Jesus serves to penetrate
the numbness of allegedly powerful humans, and the resurrection of the crucified
Lord serves to astound the weak ones into a powerfully new way of life. The death and resurrection of Jesus calls us
to accept the reality that there is no new life without the death of the old
life; if we want to experience fullness of life, we embrace death with the hope
that dying is merely a birth pang for recreation. We accept that in order for the Kingdom of
Heaven to advance and Jesus’ rule as King to be made evident in the existence
of the church, we must resist two temptations:
1) convincing ourselves that all is okay in the world, and the second
temptation is 2) falling into a despairing cynicism about the world being
beyond repair. I hope to assert that the
cross is our starting point for recognizing the brokenness of the world, and
the resurrection is God’s way of ultimately energizing a community alternative
to the kingdoms made by the world. Let’s
begin with the cross.
The
Cross
All of Jesus’ teachings and the actions
of his earthly existence could only lead to death – namely death on a cross. In Jesus’ day, there were many
so-called-christs. There were many who came before and followed after Jesus who
claimed to be the anointed ones of God.
Most of these pseudo-Christs believed that God’s plan was to overthrow
the Empire and replace the Kings and Caesars of Rome with a King from the line
of David; and in so doing, a new era would come about – one in which the
promised land would not only be occupied by Jews, but would be ruled by God’s
people as well. Some of these messianic
hopers were called Zealots. The Zealots
of Jesus’ time, believed that there would be a violent revolution, followed
thereafter by a reconstitution of the ancient Hebrew Covenant Law.
If we refer to Luke 6:15, we see that Jesus
chose at least one of these Zealots to be an immediate disciple and follower –
Simon called the Zealot. There was,
among the Zealots of Jesus’ time, a more distinct group called the Sicarii,
named after the type of dagger they carried to public events. At these public events, the hooded Zealots,
with their concealed weapons, would scatter about the crowds and stealthily
attack Romans, Roman sympathizers, Herodian officials, and even fellow Jews
whose wealth brought them great comfort in the Roman Empire (i.e. the Sadducees
and the tax collectors). If you recall,
Judas Iscariot was one of Jesus’ chosen followers. Ponder, for a moment, the title given him:
Iscariot . . . Sicarii. It is a great
mystery and perhaps even miraculous how Matthew the tax collector, another
follower of Jesus, and Judas sat at the same table, slept in the same quarters,
and didn’t die at the other’s hand. But
Simon, Matthew, Judas, and many of Jesus’ other followers knew that the test
for the truthfulness of a messiah was whether or not that so-called Messiah evaded
the punishment given to those messiahs who threatened the Roman Empire—the
cross.
Jesus’ death was the death of an insurrectionist. All of the pseudo-Christs before and after
Jesus were put to death by the Empire; and most of them were put to death on a
cross, which was the most humiliating death of all. The cross was not merely a punishment for the
insurrectionist, but it was also a message to the masses. The title given to Jesus and placed above him
on the cross, “Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews,” was a mockery of his claim
and a warning for any who might have been following him to keep quiet; it was a
warning for any who might think about making the same claim for themselves or
about another messiah. The cross was the
end . . . the last word . . . the final say.
The cross killed all hope for a new and better existence for the
followers of the would-be-king.
You may understand now, why Jesus’
followers were so baffled by Jesus’ embrace of the cross and death. Many of them were most likely waiting for
Jesus to make his move and restore the throne on earth. Perhaps this is why Judas turned Jesus over
and why Peter drew a sword at Jesus’ arrest.
They were expecting a violent overthrow in the spirit of King David and
the Israelite kings of old, and maybe they thought that in those moments, Jesus
would make his move. But he didn’t.
We know now, that the Kingdom of God
is quite contrary to the kingdoms of this world. Great empires and the kings and rulers of
this world have become numb to death. It
is a way of life. Paul refers to the
powers-that-be as agents of God’s wrath.
They hang people on crosses regularly; it is normal. They see people dying of hunger regularly; it
is normal. They see innocent civilians
dying on a regular basis because of war; it is normal. They know the rates of death to diseases worldwide
and how to prevent and cure many of them, and watch the weak ones die; it is
normal. No one is to blame. It’s just normal. We live
in one of the greatest empires in all history.
Death has become so normal to us that, as a people and as a worldly
kingdom, we have become numb.
But the Kingdom of God is one that
penetrates numbness with grief. It is
one that embraces death and dying as the only way to new birth. The kingdom of God is one in which compassion
is the greatest criticism of our culture.
It is not the violent revolt of the pseudo-messiahs that explicitly
points to our discontent and hunger for retributive justice; it is compassion
that gives way to restorative justice. Jesus
as a compassionate King over the leper, the slave, the cripple, the blind, the
hungry, the weak, the lost, the depressed, the ostracized, the homosexual, the
HIV-stricken, the exiled Native American and the destruction of his land, the
black child forced into generational poverty because of the sins of our
fathers, the stranger within our borders –Jesus as compassionate King is a
criticism of all of our mistakes. It is
a criticism that calls us to turn and grieve the death of this world.
It is in this spirit that Jesus goes
to the cross. It was Jesus’ radical
compassion that led him to his death. By
acknowledging and empowering the weak ones in such a way that oppressors were
forced to acknowledge their injustices, Jesus asked for the cross. He knew that the world could not handle such
a radical way of being, but he knew that there was no better way. And so, with this in mind, God’s way of
dealing with the brokenness of the world was to embody its anguish. There is no greater grief for us as humans
than to come to the realization that God came to us, and we killed him. For, it is in this that we recognize what we
have done to Jesus on the cross is the natural result of our broken existence,
which is the reason for our broken world.
The Apostle Paul reminds us that all of creation groans in anticipation
of the future restoration, and that when the church recognizes these groans and
prays in ignorance, the Spirit of God intercedes with sighs too deep for words
(Rom 8:22-26).
We
must join Jesus in taking up our crosses, dying to our numbness and falsely self-glorifying
existences. We must join him in his way to the cross, where he cries out
“Father forgive them for they know not what they are doing” (Lk 23:34), or as
Walter Brueggemann puts it, “on behalf of the world that has now sentenced him,
he enters a plea of temporary insanity.”
We must lay down all pride and perceived power and take up the less
coercive, yet revolutionary power of the cross—the power that comes from the
passion, forgiveness, and heart-wrenching love of a God who enters into death
for his terrible friends.
The
Resurrection
But the cross was not the end. It was not as Pilate and the crowds had
anticipated. On that Friday that we all
ironically and paradoxically call “good,” Jesus’ compassion, his solidarity
with and empowerment of the poor, his sermon on the mount, his healing of the
sick, and his miraculous feedings of the hungry . . . it all seemed lost. The despair that his disciples and the
receptors of his good and miraculous works must have felt is evident. According to the Gospel of John, his
disciples, all but one, had abandon him at the cross. They knew, according to Roman customs, that
they would be crucified along with him if they fought back; no one can follow a
dead King unless they follow him unto death themselves. Instead, they locked themselves in a room out
of fear and despair (John 20:19). All of
the hope that they had placed in him had been lost. The Kingdom that they were expecting did not
arrive. But the cross was not the end .
. . not the last word . . . not the final say!
After two days of grieving, a strange
occurrence took place –one that penetrated the despair and cynicism of the
outcasts . . . one that bewildered, that shook, that amazed, that restored
hope. The resurrection of the crucified
Lord served as the vindication of the true Messiah. It served as a promise to the weak ones that
their suffering was taken seriously by God and that one day they too would
share in the resurrection of Christ. If
the cross is the fulfillment of Jesus’ words about forgiveness and enemy love,
turning the other cheek, and giving the cloths off of his back, then the
resurrection is the fulfillment of Jesus words “blessed are you who weep, for
you will laugh;” and “blessed are the poor for theirs is the Kingdom of
Heaven;” and “blessed are you when people hate you, and when they exclude you,
revile you, and defame you . . . for great is your reward in heaven.” Likewise, to the ones who are numb to death,
the resurrection fulfills Jesus’ words, “woe to you who are laughing now, for
you will mourn and weep” (Lk 6)—for the resurrection calls into question the
perceived power of the kingdoms of the world and points to the actual power of
the Kingdom of God.
It
is not a Kingdom built on violent revolution and the blood of the enemy, the
oppression of peoples, or the wisdom of philosophers. It is not built upon the principle of wealth
accumulation or the coercion of wealth redistribution. It is not built on a fear of the end. Quite the contrary, it is built on compassion
and justice. It is built on enemy love
which hopes to simultaneously forgive and correct. It is built on generosity and genuine care
for the least. It is built not upon the
principles of old, but rather upon God’s freedom to do what the prophet Isaiah
calls “a new thing.” And it is built
upon the reign of the dead One. The
resurrection of Jesus is the historical event of ultimate energizing for the
alternative community called the Church.
It should energize us to fearlessly enter into the brokenness of the
world with the assurance that God is at work amidst the suffering. And it is with all of this in mind that we
sing with the receptor of the Revelation:
‘Worthy is the Lamb that was slaughtered
to receive power and wealth and wisdom and might
and honour and glory and blessing!’ (Rev. 5:12).
to receive power and wealth and wisdom and might
and honour and glory and blessing!’ (Rev. 5:12).
CONCLUSION
The
hope of Easter is the promise that God is up to something much greater than our
minds can conceive. The resurrection of
Jesus, however, is a foreshadowing of what we will receive in the restoration
of all things. Until then, we must learn
to share in Jesus’ death until he returns.
This means that we are being called out of the numbness of the world and
into the passion of God. We are called
to enter into the brokenness of the world, sharing the promise of God’s love
and inconceivable plan to make things right.
As we partake in the elements of communion, we are reminded that we
share in Christ’s death and we share in the hope of his resurrection – for we
are his body.
Selected Bibliography
Brueggemann,
Walter. The Prophetic Imagination, Second Ed. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2001.
–See Brueggemann in regards to the prophetic motifsof
criticism and energizing in a numb and despairing environment. His comparison of what he calls the royal
consciousness (the thinking of worldly kingdoms) and the alternative
consciousness (revolving around God’s freedom, justice, and compassion) is
excellent.
Heschel,
Abraham J. The Prophets. New York
& Evanston: Harper & Row Publishers,
1962
—Heschel’s section on Jeremiah is particularly helpful
in understanding God’s anguish embodied in the prophet. Brueggemann, borrowing from Heschel, asserts
this motif into his interpretation of Jesus and the cross.
Wright,
N.T. Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church. New York:
HarperOne, 2008.
—Wright’s
historical and theological analysis of the resurrection as an actual event of vindicating hope for those who suffer is
excellent.
Yoder,
John H. The Politics of Jesus: Vicit
Agnus Noster. Grand Rapids: William B.
Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1972.
—Yoder’s analysis of the Zealot movement as it relates
to Jesus’ nonviolent way is quite helpful, here. Particularly see Yoder’s assessment
of the Gospel of Luke as it relates to the Year of Jubilee (Chapter 2 – “The
Kingdom Coming” where he addresses the Zealot revolutions) and chapter 5 on “The
Possibility of Nonviolent Resistance.”
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Where have we been? a reflection on a (almost) year Hiatus.
Greeting friends, as you may know our last article/podcast that has been posted is almost a year old. What the heck have Ryan and myself been doing the pass year. Were we traveling to the holy land? Took a time machine (Tardis, DeLorean, etc.) back to the begging of the bible to see the creation and other biblical events? Were we in hibernation? As much as these three options are tempting to use as an excuse, the answer is we both have been busy. I took a pastoral position in April and Ryan has a full-time position at a camp as there missionary coordinator. When one of us has time, the other one usually does not. Plus we are also changing our format of the blogging and the pod casting. Before, when Ryan and I were students, we would devote lots of time and energy to research and resources before we would do a podcast. Now, we are just going to talk about whatever we feel like and hopefully add supplements in later to our discussions. The blog will be more for the in depth writings. it will also be an outlet to further discussions and debates with the T&B community.
I am sorry that we have not been as active as we would like, but Ryan and I are happy with the new layout for T&B and hope to be more active after Easter.
I am sorry that we have not been as active as we would like, but Ryan and I are happy with the new layout for T&B and hope to be more active after Easter.
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Kylie Bisutti and the Apostle Paul?
About a few weeks ago, I came across a story about Kylie Bisutti. I never knew who she was or what she did for a living but a teaser had caught my attention and i was interested in reading it. Kylie Bisutti is a Victoria Secret model, or she was one. You see she quit being a model for Victoria Secret because it did not agree with her Christian beliefs. In this article (WARNING: there are sensual pictures of Kylie in this article. If this is a stumbling block for you then do not click on the link), she talks about how she was feeling convicted by being a Christian and a lingerie model. Here is one of the many quotes from Bisutti about her life change.
"I didn't really want to be that kind of role model for younger girls because I had a lot of younger Christian girls that were looking up to me and then thinking that it was okay for them to walk around and show their bodies in lingerie to guys."Reading this article, I thought about the life of the Apostle Paul. Even though Paul was a great Christian Missionary, he was still known as Saul, a christian killer, in the public eye. As much as he worked to continue to build up the mission of Jesus Christ, I am sure that there was always somebody who would remember him for his past. Bisutti, like the Apostle Paul, has made a life change, but with the power of the internet, the pictures of her Victoria Secret days are forever posted for anyone to see. I applaud Ms. Bisutti for her decision and wish her luck on her new journey.
Thursday, February 23, 2012
Thursday, December 15, 2011
Are Christian Youth Camps/Conventions Causing the Young Generation to Leave the Church?
Before reading this post it will be a good idea to read the book, "You Lost Me," by David Kinnaman or listen to our book review via podcast.
Most of my ministry training has been through working at Youth Camps. The one question that has plagued my mind the last few years is, "Why do students have a hard time staying with there commitment to Christ?" I generally, lead towards the conclusion that the church was not doing a great job discipling these students who committed there life to Christ during a camp or convention program. Now I am thinking, "what if the camps/conventions are the culprit?"
The typical outline for camp/conventions when it comes to the message is: 1.) Sin, bondage, hell 2.) Jesus, freedom, salvation 3.) Growth, discipleship. In a way, most youth camps and/or conventions follow a subtle pattern to the preaching during the Great Awakenings. You start heavy with the sin. hell preaching then towards the end talk about salvation and people will flock with tears to the alter and repent from there sinful life. Conventions and camps do the same thing, some camps are identical to the Great Awakenings pattern while others try to find a healthy balance between the sin and salvation.
The issue that all this boils down to is Guilt. Students may screw up and because of what they learn from these establishments is that they are sinners which makes them feel guilty for what they have done. Instead of asking for forgiveness and grace, they hold on to that guilt and feel like they let God down and that He is disappointed in them. They then carry this lie with them until the next camp/convention where they can finally let the guilt go. However, once they hit that ripe old age of 18, they carry the guilt with them and never have the opportunity to lay it down at the alter.
I would love to hear out readers reactions to this post or any thoughts you have about why young adults are leaving the Church.
Most of my ministry training has been through working at Youth Camps. The one question that has plagued my mind the last few years is, "Why do students have a hard time staying with there commitment to Christ?" I generally, lead towards the conclusion that the church was not doing a great job discipling these students who committed there life to Christ during a camp or convention program. Now I am thinking, "what if the camps/conventions are the culprit?"
The typical outline for camp/conventions when it comes to the message is: 1.) Sin, bondage, hell 2.) Jesus, freedom, salvation 3.) Growth, discipleship. In a way, most youth camps and/or conventions follow a subtle pattern to the preaching during the Great Awakenings. You start heavy with the sin. hell preaching then towards the end talk about salvation and people will flock with tears to the alter and repent from there sinful life. Conventions and camps do the same thing, some camps are identical to the Great Awakenings pattern while others try to find a healthy balance between the sin and salvation.
The issue that all this boils down to is Guilt. Students may screw up and because of what they learn from these establishments is that they are sinners which makes them feel guilty for what they have done. Instead of asking for forgiveness and grace, they hold on to that guilt and feel like they let God down and that He is disappointed in them. They then carry this lie with them until the next camp/convention where they can finally let the guilt go. However, once they hit that ripe old age of 18, they carry the guilt with them and never have the opportunity to lay it down at the alter.
I would love to hear out readers reactions to this post or any thoughts you have about why young adults are leaving the Church.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)